Worli seafront ultra-luxury (one apartment per floor) on a government-land SRA slum-rehabilitation scheme. Marketing omits three rehab wings (~287 families), a private bungalow and the government/SRA tenure.
RERA P51900053592 · promoter Lodha Developers Ltd / Macrotech (SRA developer Sattadhar Constructions Pvt Ltd) · CS 876(pt),877-880,894-897 Worli · unit A-4001 (40th floor) · carpet 7,855 + deck/EBVT 2,684 = 10,539 sqft · consideration Rs.131.74 Cr (registered 20.08.2025)
INVESTIGATErevisit at full-height CC + on tenure/litigation clearanceas of 06/26
Government/SRA tenure + concealed slum-rehab compound + plinth-only CC on a Rs.131.74 Cr ticket, against a genuine open sea view, Grade-A lifts and 5-min access.
A genuine marquee Worli seafront — open sea, Grade-A lifts, five minutes to the coastal road — built on a government-owned slum-rehabilitation compound the marketing never mentions, and priced to include a lift lobby you won't own.
The product is real — an open West Arabian Sea outlook for the high floors, best-in-class lifts and seamless coastal access. But the fundamentals (F, 60% of the composite) are weak: government (not freehold) slum land developed under an SRA scheme, a title qualified by pending litigations, 'Poor' RERA-filing legibility, and construction cleared only to plinth on a Rs.131.74 Cr unit. Two material omissions compound it: a slum-rehab compound (three wings, ~287 families) and a private bungalow that the marketing never shows, and a lift lobby (~Rs.8 Cr) folded into the price as area the buyer won't own. The verdict is Investigate — resolvable to a shortlist for a buyer comfortable with SRA/government tenure once the conveyance/lease, the pending-litigation list, compound segregation, full-height CC and the deck-vs-lobby split are cleared.
The five things that decide it
1This is a government-land SRA slum-rehabilitation compound, not a private estate: three rehab wings (~23/28/25 floors) for ~287 rehoused families, a private bungalow and the slum parcel share the plot; the marketing shows only the tower.
2You would be paying ~Rs.8 Cr for a lift lobby you won't own: ~600-700 sqft of common-area lobby is bundled with the deck into the 2,684 sqft 'EBVT' inside the 10,539 sqft you pay for. Unlike Nautilus, here it is priced in.
3Construction is cleared only to plinth: a Rs.131.74 Cr unit on the 40th floor of a 43-floor tower that does not yet have Commencement Certificate above plinth (RERA completion Feb 2029).
4The view and access are real: an open West Arabian Sea outlook for the high floors, Grade-A lifts (one apartment per floor), and ~5 minutes to the Coastal Road / Sea Link.
5Government (not freehold) tenure on slum land, a title qualified by pending litigations, and 'Poor' RERA-filing legibility — fundamentals to verify before a Rs.130 Cr+ commitment.
Livability
6.9/10FairPillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.
Compound Density3/10
A slum-rehab compound for ~287 families plus a private bungalow — none of it marketed
- Under SRA Reg. 33(10), the marquee sale tower shares its ~7,911 sqm plot with three rehab wings (about 23, 28 and 25 floors) rehousing roughly 287 slum-dweller families, a separate private 'Bungalow' sale building, the SITE-U/R slum and two transit camps.
- The rehab built-up area (17,753 sqm) actually exceeds the composite sale area (14,710 sqm).
Filed as a single 'composite building', the sale wing has its own dedicated lift core (likely segregating sale lifts/lobby), but the podium, driveway, open space and slum parcel are shared — so segregating the buyer from the rehab community is a real, unanswered liveability question.
Where this sits across the corpus · Compound Density
Rustomjee Crown9
Kalpataru One7
Sugee SeaKrest6
Birla Niyaara (Tower Silas)6
Sugee Marina Bay5
Prestige Nautilus4
Embassy Citadel4
Runwal Raaya3
Lodha Sea Face3
25 Downtown (Hubtown)2
Godrej Trilogy1
Lodha Sea Face ranks 9 of 11.
What to ask the builder- Is the sale-tower entrance, driveway and open space physically segregated from the rehab society and the bungalow?
Understand “Compound Density” on the X-Ray page ↗Neighbourhood5/10
Open to the sea, dense on the land side
- The west (sea) side is durable — CRZ foreshore and the Coastal Road.
- The land side is dense: a low triangular slum patch in front along the coastal road (a foreground/aesthetic item for the lower floors), the KAGK-Marg coastal redevelopment line, the Worli sewage treatment plant nearby, the on-plot rehab wings and the wider Worli mill-belt pipeline.
Where this sits across the corpus · Neighbourhood
25 Downtown (Hubtown)7
Sugee Marina Bay6
Prestige Nautilus5
Sugee SeaKrest5
Lodha Sea Face5
Godrej Trilogy4
Rustomjee Crown4
Birla Niyaara (Tower Silas)3
Embassy Citadel3
Runwal Raaya2
Kalpataru One1
Lodha Sea Face ranks 5 of 11.
What to ask the builder- What is planned on the coastal-road slum parcel and along KAGK Marg over the next 5-7 years?
Understand “Neighbourhood” on the X-Ray page ↗Peak-Hour Connectivity9/10
About 5 minutes to the Coastal Road / Sea Link
Access is seamless directly off Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan Marg — roughly 5 minutes to the nearest Coastal Road / Sea Link entry (Rexray field). Among the best access in the corpus.
Fixable? Builders like to sell connectivity as kilometres from a landmark — but the real test is time, not distance: how long you would actually be stuck, at peak hour, just getting to a fast arterial like a Sea Link or Coastal Road on-ramp. The access route and the on-ramp are municipal and outside the developer's control, so there is no fix to offer — only an honest read of the peak-hour reality today and the area's trajectory by 2032, once the surrounding pipeline has built out.
Where this sits across the corpus · Peak-Hour Connectivity
Sugee Marina Bay9
Lodha Sea Face9
Godrej Trilogy8
Prestige Nautilus7
Sugee SeaKrest7
25 Downtown (Hubtown)7
Rustomjee Crown5
Embassy Citadel5
Runwal Raaya5
Kalpataru One2
Birla Niyaara (Tower Silas)2
Lodha Sea Face ranks 2 of 11.
Understand “Peak-Hour Connectivity” on the X-Ray page ↗Kitchen Ventilation9/10
Kitchen vents to a wide utility — PASS
The kitchen opens into a wide utility, giving a confirmed exterior air path — important at this price point for heavy Indian cooking. KVF PASS.
Where this sits across the corpus · Kitchen Ventilation
Prestige Nautilus9
Sugee SeaKrest9
Kalpataru One9
Sugee Marina Bay9
Birla Niyaara (Tower Silas)9
25 Downtown (Hubtown)9
Rustomjee Crown9
Runwal Raaya9
Lodha Sea Face9
Embassy Citadel8
Godrej Trilogy6
Lodha Sea Face ranks 9 of 11.
Understand “Kitchen Ventilation” on the X-Ray page ↗Lift Wait9/10
Grade A lifts — one apartment per floor
A six-passenger-lift core serving one apartment per floor yields an up-peak interval of roughly 21-28 seconds across the 4-6 m/s luxury speed band (CIBSE engine) — Grade A, best-in-class vertical transport.
Even on conservative assumptions (a 3-4 lift subset), waits stay in the luxury A/B range.
Where this sits across the corpus · peak rush-hour lift wait
Runwal Raaya~5s
Birla Niyaara (Tower Silas)~19s
Sugee Marina Bay~20s
Sugee SeaKrest~21s
Rustomjee Crown~25s
Embassy Citadel~25s
Lodha Sea Face~24s (Grade A)
Godrej Trilogy~26s
Kalpataru One~28s
25 Downtown~29s
Prestige Nautilus~47s
Shorter is better. Lodha Sea Face ranks 7 of 11.
Understand “Lift Wait” on the X-Ray page ↗Water Adequacy6/10
SRA scheme on recycled water for amenities — WARN
- The SRA composite scheme operates in the 90-litres per person per day band, mandates recycled (not municipal) water for the swimming pool, and stages multiple NOCs before Commencement Certificate.
- The exact water-No-Objection Certificate sanctioned unit count is not in the set, so the adequacy delta cannot be precisely computed — WARN rather than FAIL.
Where this sits across the corpus · Water Adequacy
Sugee SeaKrest8
Sugee Marina Bay8
Birla Niyaara (Tower Silas)7
Godrej Trilogy6
Kalpataru One6
Lodha Sea Face6
25 Downtown (Hubtown)5
Prestige Nautilus4
Rustomjee Crown4
Runwal Raaya4
Lodha Sea Face ranks 6 of 10.
What to ask the builder- What is the sanctioned water-NOC unit count (rehab + sale) and the on-site STP capacity?
Understand “Water Adequacy” on the X-Ray page ↗Build Planning & Qualitynot yet scored
A checklist to verify with the builder — Rexray will score this attribute as the field database grows.
Rexray's database will, over time, be enriched with the attention to detail and quality ethos of each builder. For now, below is the checklist you should verify with the builder before you decide.
What to ask the builder- Who's the architect, and what comparable have they delivered?
- Do the lobbies need lights during the day?
- Gym/pool/lobby sized for how many residents? (gym sqft / residents)
- Does this unit's layout meet your Vastu requirements (entry, kitchen, master)?
- Can a fire tender or an ambulance reach the lobby?
- Who is actually building it?
- Mivan or conventional — and how are the tie-holes grouted and cracks controlled?
- What's the realistic floor-cycle, and how does the monsoon factor in?
- Which steel/cement? Facade glazing spec? MEP contractor? STP/solar?
- Which marble/fittings exactly? Which window system? VRV brand?
- Deck/bathroom waterproofing system? How's the facade sealed into the structure?
- Gypsum or block internal walls — and are the party walls insulated?
- Does the back-up generator power my whole flat, or only the common areas?
- Is the parking solo, tandem, or a mechanical stack — and how wide are the bays?
Understand “Build Planning & Quality” on the X-Ray page ↗Community7/10
Professional / UHNW sale-tower community
- The sale tower points to a professional, ultra-high-net-worth community: fully white registration above ready-reckoner, an ultra-high ticket, and large full-floor/duplex/triplex homes (the analyzed buyer resides in Beau Monde, Prabhadevi).
- The rehab co-habitation is a density (IPD) matter — sale and rehab are legally separate societies after possession — and is not a CCI input.
What to ask the builder- What is the ticket-size range in the building — the gap between the cheapest and the most expensive home?
- Is the building vegetarian-only, or skewed to a single community?
- Is it owner-occupied, or investor- and tenant-heavy?
- What is the pet policy?
Understand “Community” on the X-Ray page ↗
Findings register
10 findings · severity-ranked
Every marketed claim set against the documented fact, sourced. Critical and high first.
HIGH
Government-land SRA slum-rehabilitation compound marketed as a one-acre ultra-luxury seafront — 3 rehab wings + bungalow concealed
MarketedAn ultra-luxury one-acre seafront landmark (marquee sale tower only)
DocumentedThe plot is a government-land SRA Reg.33(10) slum-rehabilitation scheme: the marquee one-apt-per-floor sale wing shares the ~7,911 sqm compound with THREE rehab wings (~23/28/25 floors / 17,753.85 sqm rehab BUA — exceeding the 14,709.93 sqm composite sale BUA) rehousing ~287 families, plus a separate private 'Bungalow' (2,415.26 sqm) and the SITE-U/R slum.
The marquee seafront tower sits on a government-land slum-rehabilitation compound with three rehab wings and a private bungalow — none of which appear in the ultra-luxury marketing.
Source: government filings, registered documents, marketing
HIGH
Delivery contingency — Commencement Certificate granted only to PLINTH for a 43-floor / 161.5m tower (Rs.131.74 Cr unit on the 40th floor)
Marketed(possession framed aspirationally)
DocumentedAlthough the 43-floor tower (28 habitable, 161.5m) is sanctioned, the commencement certificate is physically granted only up to plinth. Unit A-4001 sits on the 40th floor (Rs.131.74 Cr) — not yet constructed/cleared; payment milestones tied to RCC level 15 and level 30. RERA completion 28.02.2029.
The tower is sanctioned but cleared for construction only to plinth — a ~Rs.131.74 Cr unit on the 40th floor that does not yet have construction approval above plinth.
Source: registered documents, government filings
MEDIUM
Government tenure — land owned by Govt of Maharashtra (Dairy Dev Commissioner) / BMC; not freehold
Marketed(silent on tenure)
DocumentedAll CS plots owned by the Government of Maharashtra (Dairy Development Commissioner); that land parcel/895 also BMC. The buyer acquires a free-sale unit developed under the SRA LOI on government slum land — not freehold, not a private lease. Conveyance/lease of the free-sale plot to the free-sale society to be confirmed.
The land is government-owned slum land developed under an SRA scheme — the buyer's tenure is a free-sale unit, not freehold.
Source: registered documents, government filings
MEDIUM
On-plot private 'Bungalow' sale building (2,415 sqm BUA) on the north boundary — rumoured owner-linked
Marketed(absent from marketing)
DocumentedA separate private 'Bungalow' sale building of 2,415.26 sqm BUA is sanctioned on the compound (RERA north boundary 'Proposed Bungalow'). It is understood to be the residence of Abhishek Lodha (owner of Lodha).
A private bungalow (rumoured owner-linked) is sanctioned on the same compound as the sale tower — disclosed in the SRA documents but not in marketing.
Source: government filings, registered documents, marketing
MEDIUM
Title qualified subject to pending litigations; certifier did no independent court search
MarketedRERA portal: 'No litigation against this project'
DocumentedThe Legal Title Report opines the free-sale-component title is clear and marketable but expressly SUBJECT TO pending litigations (detailed in the Flow-of-Title, Annexure-A), and the advocate states he conducted no independent court/authority searches.
The title opinion is qualified by pending litigations, and the certifier did not independently search the courts — a softer assurance than the RERA 'no litigation' flag implies.
Source: registered documents
MEDIUM
North aspect of lower apartments walled below ~F40 by the adjacent 38 floors Lodha SRA-Dairy tower; East compromised by the mill-belt + on-plot rehab
MarketedUninterrupted wraparound views
DocumentedNorth is partially walled below ~F40 by the adjacent 38 floors Lodha SRA-Dairy tower + the KAGK-Marg coastal redevelopment line; East is compromised (clears ~F81) by the Worli mill-belt towers and the on-plot rehab wings. Only West (sea) and South are substantially open.
Wraparound views are real to the west and south but the north is blocked below ~F40 (adjacent Lodha SRA tower) and the east faces the mill-belt/compound.
Source: Rexray analysis, government filings
MEDIUM
You pay for a lift lobby you don't own — ~600-700 sqft of common-area lobby bundled into the priced EBVT (~Rs.8 Cr)
Marketed10,539 sqft net (carpet 7,855 + 'EBVT' 2,684) sold as the residence
DocumentedThe registered the agreement lumps the open deck together with the building LIFT-LOBBY (common area) into a single 2,684 sqft 'EBVT', of which ~600-700 sqft is the lift lobby — legally common area the buyer does NOT own but bundled into the 10,539 sqft they pay for (~Rs.7.5-8.7 Cr at the net rate). Unlike Nautilus (lobby = unpriced bonus, agreement silent), here the buyer is PAYING for it. One-apartment-per-floor keeps BMC-enforcement risk LOW, but the area is not the builder's to sell.
About 600-700 sqft of the priced area is a common-area lift lobby the buyer won't legally own — ~Rs.8 Cr paid for space that, unlike at Nautilus, is bundled into the price rather than given as a free bonus.
Source: registered documents, REXRAY-FIELD
LOW
Floor reconciliation RESOLVED — 43 floors total / 28 habitable / ~29 apartments; Unit A-4001 on the 40th floor
MarketedOne flat per floor (~10,500 sqft) + duplex + triplex; marketing silent on storey count
DocumentedThe 2025 RERA filing shows 43 total floors + terrace, of which 28 are habitable one-apartment-per-floor levels (plus the sub-penthouse duplexes and the triplex penthouse) — reconciling with ~29 sanctioned apartments. No floor-count inflation.
The apartment/floor counts reconcile (28 habitable floors, ~29 apartments, one per floor) — no floor inflation; the analyzed unit sits on the 40th floor.
Source: registered documents, government filings, REXRAY-FIELD
POSITIVE
West sea view genuinely open for the high apartments (raycast W band 7); triangular coastal slum is an SRD foreground for low floors
MarketedUninterrupted ocean views that wrap around you
DocumentedThe West Arabian Sea aspect is open (no built wall in-arc; CRZ foreshore + Coastal Road) and the apartments start high, so the marketed sea view holds for the W aspect. The low triangular coastal slum + KAGK-Marg redevelopment affect only the lowest floors' foreground (SRD/aesthetic), not the high-apartment sea view; N is partially walled below ~F40 and E faces the compound/mill-belt.
The marquee west sea view is genuinely open for the high one-per-floor apartments; the coastal slum in front is a low-floor SRD/aesthetic item rather than a sea-view blocker.
Source: Rexray analysis, government filings, marketing
POSITIVE
Registered above ready-reckoner (fully white at a premium); best-in-class lifts (Grade A) and 5-min seafront access
MarketedUltra-luxury bespoke residences
DocumentedThe unit registered at Rs.131.74 Cr — ~57% ABOVE the ready-reckoner (Rs.85.97 Cr), fully white at a premium. EWT Grade A (6-lift core, one apt/floor), RHARC ~5 min to the Coastal Road / Sea Link, kitchen vents to a wide utility (KVF PASS).
The sale is registered well above ready-reckoner (clean/white), with best-in-class lifts and 5-minute seafront access.
Source: registered documents, government filings, REXRAY-FIELD