Detailed Report · as of 2026-09-14

Palais Royale

A Supreme Court refuge-and-FSI saga; RERA lapsed, occupied only to the 53rd of 56 floors · RERA P51900006786

Lower Parel / Worli Estate - P51900006786 - Honest Shelters (ex-SRUIL)

Overall Score5.1/10as of 2026-09-14

Marketed as India's crowning address; on the record one of its most notorious - fifteen years of municipal demolition notices, a parking-lot FSI battle and floors raised ahead of sanction, settled only by the Supreme Court.

Flags
  1. MahaRERA registration has LAPSED - the revised completion date passed without renewal, so the project cannot lawfully be marketed or sold until it is.
  2. Occupation certificate reaches only the 53rd floor, though the building is constructed to the 56th - the top floors are not yet occupation-certified.
  3. Title rests on a 2019 lender sale after the first developer's insolvency; no certificate covers that chain, and a Rs 400 cr charge sits on the land.
1 further flag
  1. A creditor and statutory docket (Indian Bank, IIFL/Sammaan and others) remains live into 2026.

The five things that decide it
1A 20-year litigation trail incl. a 2019 Supreme Court judgment; the creditor docket is still live into 2026.
2Roughly half of a flagship 'duplex' is non-RERA refuge and common area you don't own; a Supreme Court order requires it kept open and accessible to all occupants, so it cannot be privatised - don't let it be treated as your exclusive space.
3The developer was substituted via a 2019 lender sale-certificate after insolvency; the only title certificate is 2007, pre-substitution.
4Marketing sells 72 storeys, ~320 m and 152 residences; the sanction is 56 floors, ~300 m and 162 units - the sale-plan floor number runs about eight above the approved one.
5The tower is topped out and occupation-certified to the 53rd floor - the usual construction risk is largely behind it.
FVL — Rexray's index · F Fundamentals · V Value · L Livability · each pillar is the average of its scored attributes, scored 0–10: Weak (<4) · Mixed (4–6) · Fair (6–7.5) · Strong (7.5+) · the verdict is set separately, by hard-stop rules · Scoring Methodology →

Fundamentals

4.5/10Mixed

Pillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.

Clear Title4.0/10
Freehold, but a 2007 title behind a 2019 lender sale and a 20-year litigation trail

Freehold former mill land, but the title is heavy: the only certificate on file is a 2007 SRUIL-era Little & Co report (pre-substitution); title now rests on a 2019 lender Sale Certificate after the original developer's insolvency; a Rs 400 cr Beacon/Sammaan charge subsists; and a ~20-year litigation history (Supreme Court 2019 on refuge + parking-lot floor area (FSI)) sits behind a still-live 2025-26 creditor and inter-se docket.

Understand “Clear Title” on the X-Ray page ↗
Delivery6.0/10
Topped out and part-occupied - but RERA has lapsed and who finishes it is unclear
  • The construction risk that defines the Rexray set is largely retired - the tower is topped out at 56 floors and occupation-certified to the 53rd approved floor (Dec 2024).
  • Held back by a LAPSED RERA registration, the top 3 floors un-OC'd, and uncertainty over who finishes and renews it after a 15-year stall.
Understand “Delivery” on the X-Ray page ↗
Developer Compliance3.0/10
The portal is out of step - lapsed, blank Commencement Certificate table, approvals only in the agreement

RERA legibility/compliance is poor: registration LAPSED, an empty portal commencement-certificate table, and the governing 2021 plan / 2022 Commencement Certificate / 2022-24 Part OCs / revised certificate all recovered from the registered agreement rather than the portal.

Understand “Developer Compliance” on the X-Ray page ↗
Brochure-vs-Reality5.0/10
Sells 72 storeys and blanket sea views; the sanction is 56 floors and high-floor sea
  • Marketing overstates - 320 m / 88 storeys / 152 residences / blanket sea views - against the sanction of ~300 m, 56 approved floors (72 on the sale plan), 162 units and a sea view that only the upper floors get.
  • But the tower is real and delivered, and the refuge/exclusive-use split is disclosed in the agreement's own annexure.
Understand “Brochure-vs-Reality” on the X-Ray page ↗

Value

5.3/10Mixed

Pillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.

View6.0/10
A top-floor asset: upper floors clear to the sea, Kalpataru One walls the lower west
  • At ~300 m on an ~84x86 m plate the upper floors clear the corridor with a real Arabian-Sea aspect; East and north-west are open from low floors.
  • But the priced west/SW sea arc is walled by Kalpataru One only 78 m away (its near towers ~204 m, the far one 281 m), and NE/S/SE are partly blocked (Niyaara/Adrina/Imperia, Embassy Citadel, Runwal Raaya).
  • A high-floor asset, obstructed below.
Palais Royale — the plot and what surrounds it
Rexray View Map: Palais Royale and its surrounding development
Understand “View” on the X-Ray page ↗
Layout & Living7.3/10
~84% - clean rectangular large-format layout around the central atrium

~84% off the legible duplex plate - clean rectangular rooms, columns in walls, an efficient large-format layout wrapping the central atrium; disclosed balconies are a normal open-deck feature.

What to ask the builder
  • The west-face glass specification — brand, glazing thickness, and the heat-trapping (SHGC / U-value) number.
Understand “Layout & Living” on the X-Ray page ↗
Non-RERA Area2.5/10
Half the 'duplex' is unowned refuge and exclusive-use area you cannot enclose
  • The defining defect.
  • The sample duplex buys 513.72 sqm of RERA carpet but is granted 'exclusive use' of 549.84 sqm of NON-RERA area on top (107% of carpet) - dominated by refuge passage, fire-escape passage and moat.
  • Only ~48% of what the unit occupies is owned; the refuge portion legally must stay open and cannot be enclosed, and doing so invites BMC notices - the very issue the Supreme Court litigated.
Understand “Non-RERA Area” on the X-Ray page ↗
Pricing5.5/10
Rs 1-1.5 lakh/sqft retail; the one registered deal is an investor buy below that
  • Retail band Rs 1.0-1.5 lakh/sqft carpet is reasonable for a Worli-edge tower with genuine high-floor views; the one registered comp (~Rs 93k/sqft) is an investor/bulk buy below that.
  • But effective value is muddied - you pay carpet rate while ~half the 'grandeur' is unowned exclusive-use area - and the litigation/lapsed-RERA overhang and uncertain completion weigh on liquidity.
What to ask the builder
  • What is the all-in cost — including stamp duty, registration and goods-and-services tax (GST)?
  • What is the rate on the area I actually own (carpet plus deck) versus the marketed area?
  • What have recent apartments in this building / micro-market actually registered at?
Understand “Pricing” on the X-Ray page ↗

Livability

6.9/10Fair

Pillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.

Compound Density6.5/10
One sale tower, but legacy owners, a public car-park and the Reliance buildings share the plot
  • A single free-sale tower, no rehab co-habitation.
  • Density comes from ~142 legacy owners (2007-2013) carved out of the lender sale sharing the layout with the public parking building and the Reliance buildings, plus a MHADA/BMC parking area already given away off the larger plot.
Understand “Compound Density” on the X-Ray page ↗
Neighbourhood5.0/10
Worli Naka congestion inside a dense tall-tower cluster
  • Sits at the heavily congested Worli Naka junction inside a dense tall-tower cluster - Kalpataru One, Indiabulls Blu, Runwal Raaya, the BDD Chawls redevelopment and Embassy Citadel.
  • Amenity-rich but high traffic, footfall and noise.
Understand “Neighbourhood” on the X-Ray page ↗
Peak-Hour Connectivity7.0/10
~10 minutes to the coastal road

~10 minutes (11am weekday) to the nearest Worli coastal-road entry - good access despite the Worli Naka congestion.

Fixable? Builders like to sell connectivity as kilometres from a landmark — but the real test is time, not distance: how long you would actually be stuck, at peak hour, just getting to a fast arterial like a Sea Link or Coastal Road on-ramp. The access route and the on-ramp are municipal and outside the developer's control, so there is no fix to offer — only an honest read of the peak-hour reality today and the area's trajectory by 2032, once the surrounding pipeline has built out.
Understand “Peak-Hour Connectivity” on the X-Ray page ↗
Kitchen Ventilation9.0/10
PASS - external kitchen window

PASS - the kitchen sits on the external ring with an openable window and adjacent utility; a genuine exterior air path.

Understand “Kitchen Ventilation” on the X-Ray page ↗
Lift Wait8.0/10
Grade B - six passenger lifts, no queue on a 56-floor stack
  • Grade B (conservative).
  • Six passenger lifts plus two service/goods lifts serve 56 floors at ~4 apartments a floor; interval 27-38 s across the luxury band, with a light family count for six lifts - no queue on a tower this tall.
Understand “Lift Wait” on the X-Ray page ↗
Water Adequacy7.0/10
Ordinary municipal water conditions, no shortfall found

The municipal approval carries ordinary water and hydraulic-engineer conditions rather than a stated shortfall; no No-Objection Certificate count delta was extractable, so held at a neutral-good read pending the sanctioned water No-Objection Certificate.

Understand “Water Adequacy” on the X-Ray page ↗
Parking6.0/10
Drivable self-park podium, but eight ramped levels and no visitor bays
  • Anchor A/B - a drivable self-park podium with a central helical ramp over eight parking levels, 746 covered + 100 open bays.
  • Tempered by the eight-level dispersion, the single circular two-way ramp, zero visitor parking and deferred bay allotment.
Understand “Parking” on the X-Ray page ↗
Build Planning & Qualitynot yet scored
A checklist to verify with the builder — Rexray will score this attribute as the field database grows.

Rexray's database will, over time, be enriched with the attention to detail and quality ethos of each builder. For now, below is the checklist you should verify with the builder before you decide.

What to ask the builder
  • Who's the architect, and what comparable have they delivered?
  • Do the lobbies need lights during the day?
  • Gym/pool/lobby sized for how many residents? (gym sqft / residents)
  • Does this unit's layout meet your Vastu requirements (entry, kitchen, master)?
  • Can a fire tender or an ambulance reach the lobby?
  • Who is actually building it?
  • Mivan or conventional — and how are the tie-holes grouted and cracks controlled?
  • What's the realistic floor-cycle, and how does the monsoon factor in?
  • Which steel/cement? Facade glazing spec? MEP contractor? STP/solar?
  • Which marble/fittings exactly? Which window system? VRV brand?
  • Deck/bathroom waterproofing system? How's the facade sealed into the structure?
  • Gypsum or block internal walls — and are the party walls insulated?
  • Does the back-up generator power my whole flat, or only the common areas?
  • Is the parking solo, tandem, or a mechanical stack — and how wide are the bays?
Understand “Build Planning & Quality” on the X-Ray page ↗
Community6.5/10
A marquee address gone investor-heavy; premium if it completes well
  • Launched as a marquee, tallest-in-India address with Talati as architect; after the stall and insolvency it skews to investors layered over long-standing legacy owners.
  • If completed well it can still command a premium on that pedigree - but who completes it is not established.
What to ask the builder
  • What is the ticket-size range in the building — the gap between the cheapest and the most expensive home?
  • Is the building vegetarian-only, or skewed to a single community?
  • Is it owner-occupied, or investor- and tenant-heavy?
  • What is the pet policy?
Understand “Community” on the X-Ray page ↗

Findings register

14 findings · severity-ranked

Every marketed claim set against the documented fact, sourced. Critical and high first.

HIGH
A twenty-year litigation trail settled by the Supreme Court, with a creditor docket still live into 2026
MarketedA marquee, now-cleared luxury tower actively marketed for sale.
DocumentedA ~20-year, multi-forum litigation history: a 2019 Supreme Court judgment (CA 8265-8272/2019) on refuge area and the public-parking-lot deemed permission, preceded by High Court appeals, PILs by Janhit Manch, s.51 MRTP demolition proceedings and NCLT insolvency (CP 1472 & 1519/2017). The registration is LAPSED and the docket is still live — 56 complaints, 21 appeals and 11 non-compliance entries running into 2026 (Indian Bank, IIFL/Sammaan, Joshi, Lodha, Action Barter).
HIGH
Refuge area was inflated to ~60% of habitable area and sold as decks; the 2016 order cut it back and made it non-saleable
MarketedRefuge / deck / terrace areas presented as part of what the buyer gets.
DocumentedRefuge (fire-safety) area was found inflated to ~39,000 sqm against 54,715 sqm habitable (~60%, against a 4% norm) and alleged sold to buyers 'under the guise of decks/terraces' to manufacture saleable area. The Municipal Commissioner's order of 31/08/2016 cut recognised refuge to ~23%, refused four full refuge floors, and DIRECTED the refuge areas be recorded in every sale deed as non-saleable and kept open/accessible; the Supreme Court upheld that order in 2019.
HIGH
The tower's original developer went into insolvency; today's promoter bought the plot from the lender in 2019
MarketedA single developer's flagship project.
DocumentedThe tower was begun and RERA-registered by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd, which defaulted and went into NCLT/liquidation. The current promoter, Honest Shelters Pvt Ltd, acquired the plot from lender India Infoline/Indiabulls (now Sammaan Capital) by a Sale Certificate dated 26/06/2019 — a lender-enforcement acquisition — excepting 142 already-sold apartments, the public parking building and the Reliance buildings.
HIGH
Only about half of what a flagship unit occupies is owned carpet; the rest is non-RERA 'exclusive use' area
MarketedA grand duplex residence (e.g. the '44SE' Manor).
DocumentedThe per-unit area table (the agreement Annexure 3A) shows RERA carpet 513.72 sqm but 549.84 sqm of NON-RERA 'exclusive use' area on top (107% of carpet) - dominated by refuge passage (176.24), fire-escape passage (70.80), moat (62.89), planter (79.88), niche (54.51), flower bed (37.92). Only ~48% of the ~1,064 sqm the unit occupies is owned. Critically, the Supreme-Court-upheld 2016 order requires these refuge areas be KEPT OPEN and ACCESSIBLE TO ALL OCCUPANTS at all times - so granting them to one flat as 'exclusive use' contradicts a binding order; the buyer pays for a private right the order assigns to the whole building.
HIGH
Those exclusive-use areas are fire refuge the court requires be kept open and accessible to all occupants
MarketedExpansive private exclusive-use areas attached to each residence.
DocumentedThe exclusive-use areas (refuge passage 176.24 sqm, fire-escape 70.80, moat 62.89, etc.) are fire-refuge that the SC-upheld 2016 order requires be recorded as non-habitable AND kept OPEN and ACCESSIBLE to ALL occupants at all times, with access routes displayed. The order did not seal them off - it required them communal. A buyer who encloses or privately occupies them both invites BMC enforcement (the Rustomjee Crown class of risk) and has no right to exclude other occupants. A physical site check is needed: are the access routes displayed and the refuge kept open, or has it been privatised per flat?
MEDIUM
Sale-plan floor numbers run ~8 above the approved plan - a 'floor 44' unit is the 33rd sanctioned level
MarketedSale-plan floor numbers up to 72 (a unit labelled 'floor 44').
DocumentedThe sanctioned/approved plan is 56 upper floors; the sale plan renumbers to 72, and the developer's own sold-inventory disclosure tabulates each unit's sale-plan floor against its MCGM-approval floor (~+8) — a unit sold as 'floor 44' is the 33rd approved level. Disclosed rather than concealed, but material to floor-premium comparison.
MEDIUM
The only title certificate on file predates the 2019 sale and certifies the old owner; a Rs 400 cr charge subsists
MarketedClear, marketable title.
DocumentedThe only title certificate in the record is a Little & Co detailed report of about 2007 certifying the ORIGINAL promoter SRUIL, before the 2019 Sale Certificate and the Honest Shelters acquisition. No fresh certificate covering the current owner's chain is on file, and a ₹400 crore Beacon Trusteeship charge subsists on the land with a per-flat No-Objection Certificate on sale.
MEDIUM
Built and occupation-certified to the 53rd floor, but the MahaRERA registration has lapsed and was not renewed
MarketedA ready / near-ready luxury tower.
DocumentedPhysically substantially complete — full Commencement Certificate to the 56th floor (12/08/2022) and occupation certificates to the 53rd approved floor (17/12/2024). But the MahaRERA registration has LAPSED with its revised December-2024 completion date elapsed and not renewed, the top ~3 approved floors are above the latest OC, and the creditor docket is live. A lapsed registration constrains lawful marketing/sale until renewed.
MEDIUM
The marketed sea view is a high-floor asset - the western arc is about half walled below the upper floors
MarketedSea view (the tower's marketed western aspect).
DocumentedIn-corridor raycast: the western (Arabian Sea) arc is ~49% walled below ~engine-floor 81 by the Worli sea-face cluster (Embassy Citadel, Kalpataru One, Runwal Raaya), and the north-west/N arcs are similarly blocked below ~engine-floor 74/81 by Raheja Riviere/Imperia and Crown/Niyaara/Adrina. The sea is a HIGH-FLOOR asset; low and mid habitable floors look into the Lower Parel/Worli skyline. NE/E/SE/S are open. Floor thresholds convert DOWN to this building's taller floors (REVIEW).
MEDIUM
The RERA portal record is stale and incomplete - the governing plan, full Commencement Certificate and part OCs are not on it
MarketedThe portal is the source of truth.
DocumentedThe portal carries the project as LAPSED with an empty Commencement Certificate table, lists one building of 84 floors, and does not surface the governing 2021 plan, the 2022 full Commencement Certificate, the 2022/2024 Part OCs or the revised RERA certificate — all of which were recovered from the registered agreement's annexures. It does disclose the ₹400 cr charge and the litigation.
LOW-MED
The one registered comparable is an investor bulk purchase, not a retail sale, so the price band is unproven
DocumentedThe one registered comparable (~₹51.47 cr, ~₹93,000/sqft carpet, 33rd approved floor, Aug 2025) is an INVESTOR/bulk purchase by an LLP buying under the stamp set-off provision, not a retail end-user sale — so it is not a clean retail band. A retail band and the cash component are field items.
LOW-MED
Two owner vintages in one building: ~142 apartments sold pre-2019 on the old developer's terms
DocumentedAbout 142 apartments were sold under the original promoter (2007-2011) and excepted from the lender's sale, so the building carries two owner vintages on old and new terms, alongside a public parking building and the Reliance buildings on the shared layout. Society/apex-body structure across the vintages is a live question.
LOW-MED
The 220 m central atrium is a signature feature and a standing common-area lighting and cooling bill
MarketedA landmark tower with a grand 220 m central atrium.
DocumentedThe ~220 m central atrium (35 m skylight) is a signature feature but a REXRAY OpEx flag: a void that tall admits limited daylight/natural ventilation to lower and middle floors and may need day-long artificial lighting and air-conditioning, a heavy recurring common-area electricity and maintenance burden borne by the society. A prospective buyer should size the atrium running cost before committing.
POSITIVE
The existential planning and demolition risk is resolved - modified sanction granted and the building stands certified
DocumentedAgainst a fifteen-year litigation-stalled history, the modified sanction was granted (full Commencement Certificate to F56, 2021 plan) and the building is occupation-certified to the 53rd approved floor — so the existential planning and demolition risk that once hung over it has been resolved, and finish/lift/water/parking can be checked on site rather than promised.
Five questions to ask before you commit
  1. Before you believe any 'exclusive use' pitch on the refuge/deck/moat next to the flat: a Supreme Court order says those areas are common and must stay open to all occupants - you cannot own or enclose them. Confirm on site.
  2. Is the MahaRERA registration renewed, and can the developer lawfully sell right now?
  3. Who is actually completing the building, and what is the final/full occupation certificate position above the 53rd floor?
  4. Is there a title certificate covering the chain after the 2019 lender sale, and is the Rs 400 cr charge released on your flat?
  5. What does the central atrium cost to run, and what is the maintenance/outgoing per square foot?
Rexray — Real Estate X-Ray. This is a research view built from registered documents, government filings, and Rexray field analysis; it is not legal, financial, or investment advice. Verify every figure against the source documents before you transact.
© 2026 Rexray.AI