Detailed Report · as of 2026-09-09

Godrej Horizon Phase III

Marketed 'Dadar-Wadala'; the registered locality is Wadala. · RERA P51900078358 (Godrej Horizon Phase III - Sale Tower-3, Wings A & B)

P68 - Godrej Horizon Phase III (Sale Tower-3, Wings A & B), Azad Nagar, R.A. Kidwai Marg, Wadala, Mumbai 400031. DCR 33(7) MCGM chawl redevelopment; 362 sale units.

Overall Score6.0/10as of 2026-09-09

A fairly-priced Wadala address with a real harbour view from the upper floors and a developer visibly building out the estate - the catch is that this is the last and earliest-stage tower, still at basement against a 2031 timeline, on a dense municipal-redevelopment plot.

Flags none

The five things that decide it
1You are buying the estate's LAST and earliest-stage tower (Tower 3) - at basement level against a 2031 completion with ~47% already sold - though the developer is executing (two of three sale towers topped out, nearing possession ahead of their RERA dates).
2From about the 20th floor up the east aspect is a real, open harbour outlook - above the sibling towers, over low-rise Tejas Colony, the port land and BPCL; west is deliberately the non-view side.
3Sound livability and fair pricing: self-park by ramp near your tower (~1.35 bays a home with visitor bays), Grade-B lifts, external-envelope kitchens, an efficient rectangular layout, and ~Rs 38k/sqft inside the Rs 35-40k Wadala band.
4A connectivity upgrade is coming: ~25 min to the Atal Setu today, and the Sewri-Worli Elevated Connector - about 10 min away and roughly two years out - will plug Wadala into the coastal-road network.
5The RERA portal's legibility is poor - it denies litigation and encumbrance that the developer's own documents disclose; read the documents, not the portal.
FVL — Rexray's index · F Fundamentals · V Value · L Livability · each pillar is the average of its scored attributes, scored 0–10: Weak (<4) · Mixed (4–6) · Fair (6–7.5) · Strong (7.5+) · the verdict is set separately, by hard-stop rules · Scoring Methodology →

Fundamentals

5.5/10Mixed

Pillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.

Clear Title6.5/10
Normal municipal-redevelopment tenure, with one legacy dispute
  • As with any Mumbai chawl or slum redevelopment, the land stays with the municipality and the societies; the developer builds under a registered development agreement and tri-partite agreement with the municipality as a party.
  • That the developer does not own the land is normal here, not a defect - and the rights are plainly operative, with two of the three sale towers topped out.
  • The one residual is legacy litigation: the developer the municipality replaced in 2020 is still contesting its removal, and a Notice of Lis Pendens sits on the record.
  • The title opinion holds the pending matters do not affect the current developer's rights, and the build-out corroborates that - so this is a cloud to confirm the current status of, not a stop.
  • Separately, treat the 'no encumbrance' claim as untested: a Rs 279.97 crore project loan sits against a nil-charge declaration whose CERSAI search covered only one of sixteen parcels.
Understand “Clear Title” on the X-Ray page ↗
Delivery5.5/10
Basement stage and last to build - but the estate is delivering ahead of its RERA dates

This tower is still at basement level against a June-2031 completion, with only a plinth-stage commencement certificate, while nearly half the flats are already sold or booked - so the real exposure here is construction time, not price.

  • The reassurance is the rest of the estate: the two sibling sale towers are nearing possession (one by end-2026, the other targeting December-2027), both ahead of their RERA dates, and the rehab is progressing - the developer is visibly executing this scheme, and this tower is simply the earliest-stage and last to finish.
  • Build quality is the thing to check, as the developer is relatively newer to real-estate execution.
Understand “Delivery” on the X-Ray page ↗
Developer Compliance4.5/10
The regulator's record is present but contradicts itself
  • The RERA page denies any litigation and any financial encumbrance - yet the developer's own title report annexes thirteen pending High Court matters and a live complaint, and a chartered-accountant certificate records a Rs 279.97 crore project loan.
  • The 'multiple phases' flag is blank on a four-phase estate, and the parking table renders as all-zeros.
  • None of this is fatal on its own, but it means the portal cannot be taken at face value - every material fact has to be read from the underlying documents.
  • Compliance legibility here is poor.
Understand “Developer Compliance” on the X-Ray page ↗
Brochure-vs-Reality5.5/10
Most claims hold up high; a few don't hold low

The marketed east 'sea view' is real - but only from the upper floors; lower and mid floors look straight into the developer's own taller towers. 'Dadar-Wadala' gently upgrades a registered Wadala address, and the amenity programme is forward-dated to 2028-2030.

The larger gap is what the marketing is silent on - the municipal-land tenure, the litigation and the borrowing - all of which surface only in the documents.

Understand “Brochure-vs-Reality” on the X-Ray page ↗

Value

6.9/10Fair

Pillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.

View6.0/10
A genuine harbour outlook from the 20th floor up
  • From roughly the 20th floor and above, the east aspect opens over the two sibling towers and a low-rise eastern foreground - the Tejas Colony block, then port land, then BPCL - to the harbour beyond, a durable outlook because the railway corridor and port land in front are unlikely to wall up.
  • Below that, the sibling towers and the podium interrupt the view.
  • West is deliberately the non-view side - the smallest apartments face it - while the premium corner unit is open on both east and west for cross-ventilation.
  • The south side looks over an open municipal playground.
  • A precise, floor-by-floor view map still needs the surrounding-building heights modelled, so this reading is directional.
Godrej Horizon Phase III — the plot and what surrounds it
Rexray View Map: Godrej Horizon Phase III and its surrounding development
Understand “View” on the X-Ray page ↗
Layout & Living7.0/10
An efficient, deck-served rectangular layout
  • The apartment plate is a clean rectangular double-wing layout - five homes a wing, each with its kitchen on an outside wall, a utility area and a balcony or deck.
  • There is no awkward pinwheel geometry and no loss to an odd envelope, so the internal layout is efficient, in the low-70s percent.
  • The building's lift and stair core is dealt with separately under lift-wait, not counted against the apartment layout.
  • The exact carpet-to-built-up figure is best confirmed against the registered carpet schedule.
What to ask the builder
  • The west-face glass specification — brand, glazing thickness, and the heat-trapping (SHGC / U-value) number.
Understand “Layout & Living” on the X-Ray page ↗
Non-RERA Area8.0/10
No hidden common area you pay for but can't own
  • The balcony and utility areas the marketing counts as saleable are disclosed, separately-stated open areas that you genuinely buy - not a restricted-common-area trap.
  • The tower lobby, lifts and staircases are declared free-of-floor area (FSI) common areas with no per-flat exclusive-use foyer carved out.
Understand “Non-RERA Area” on the X-Ray page ↗
Pricing6.5/10
Fairly priced for Wadala, with one open question
  • The one registered sale here works out to about Rs 38,000 a square foot on carpet, which sits inside the Rs 35-40,000 band for the Wadala/Azad Nagar micro-market - fair, not inflated.
  • Some projects in the area are testing higher, Sewri-like numbers on the strength of the coming Sewri-Worli connector.
  • Registered rate ~Rs 38,270/sqft carpet vs a ready-reckoner ~Rs 17,050
  • Micro-market band Rs 35-40k/sqft (field); Sewri upside Rs 45-55k on the connector
  • Semi-finished RCC shell - fit-out is over and above
  • Open: any cash component, and the full 2/3BHK rate card
What to ask the builder
  • What is the all-in cost — including stamp duty, registration and goods-and-services tax (GST)?
  • What is the rate on the area I actually own (carpet plus deck) versus the marketed area?
  • What have recent apartments in this building / micro-market actually registered at?
Understand “Pricing” on the X-Ray page ↗

Livability

6.6/10Fair

Pillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.

Compound Density5.5/10
High-density municipal redevelopment, but the rehab is kept separate
  • This is a dense municipal redevelopment - close to 1,800 tenements across the estate, with roughly one rehab home for every three sale homes.
  • What protects the sale buyer is physical separation: the rehab families are rehoused in their own towers at the eastern end, with a separate entrance off the main road, rather than sharing the sale tower.

Temples, a balwadi, a gymnasium and municipal facilities are retained on or beside the estate, and a school playground abuts the south edge.

Understand “Compound Density” on the X-Ray page ↗
Neighbourhood5.0/10
A working municipal fringe with specific nuisances
  • The immediate surroundings are mixed: a railway corridor to the east (noise, but also the open edge the harbour view depends on), a sewerage pumping station to the north (an odour/nuisance neighbour), a school playground to the south, and the estate's own rehab cluster to the east.
  • It is a working municipal-fringe setting rather than a manicured one.

How the wider neighbourhood develops over the next five years is still to be pinned down for this out-of-corridor location.

Understand “Neighbourhood” on the X-Ray page ↗
Peak-Hour Connectivity6.0/10
Moderate today, a big connectivity jump coming
  • Getting to the fast road network takes about 25 minutes today, to the Atal Setu and Eastern Freeway.
  • The step-change is the Sewri-Worli Elevated Connector: about ten minutes from the estate road and, once open in roughly two years, it plugs Wadala straight into the coastal-road network - a material upgrade to west-side reach.
Fixable? Builders like to sell connectivity as kilometres from a landmark — but the real test is time, not distance: how long you would actually be stuck, at peak hour, just getting to a fast arterial like a Sea Link or Coastal Road on-ramp. The access route and the on-ramp are municipal and outside the developer's control, so there is no fix to offer — only an honest read of the peak-hour reality today and the area's trajectory by 2032, once the surrounding pipeline has built out.
Understand “Peak-Hour Connectivity” on the X-Ray page ↗
Kitchen Ventilation9.0/10
Every kitchen breathes to the outside
  • Every apartment's kitchen sits on an outside wall with an adjoining utility/dry balcony and a weather ledge, so there is a real external air path - no sealed, recirculating kitchens.
  • This passes cleanly.
Understand “Kitchen Ventilation” on the X-Ray page ↗
Lift Wait7.5/10
Quick, comfortable lifts

Each wing has four passenger lifts (plus a service and a fire-evacuation lift) serving five homes a floor over forty floors, giving a lift-wait interval in the mid-40 seconds - comfortably in the luxury band.

Understand “Lift Wait” on the X-Ray page ↗
Water Adequacyqualitative
Water approval not yet issued
  • The water and sewerage no-objection is deferred to the pre-construction-certificate stage and has not been granted yet, so there is nothing to check the sanctioned water provision against at this point.
  • Worth revisiting when the water No-Objection Certificate is issued.
Understand “Water Adequacy” on the X-Ray page ↗
Parking7.0/10
Self-park by ramp, close to your tower
  • You drive to your own bay: parking sits in a shared multi-level podium and basements under the sale-tower cluster (with a landscaped deck on top) plus a dedicated car-park building, reached by ramps rather than a car-lift.
  • There are about 1.35 bays per home, visitor bays are provided, and allotments are made close to your own tower.

The only mild costs are the time spent driving through a multi-level stack and a short walk to the lift lobby - not the lift-dependent parking the first pass had flagged before the podium plan was read.

Understand “Parking” on the X-Ray page ↗
Build Planning & Qualitynot yet scored
A checklist to verify with the builder — Rexray will score this attribute as the field database grows.

Rexray's database will, over time, be enriched with the attention to detail and quality ethos of each builder. For now, below is the checklist you should verify with the builder before you decide.

What to ask the builder
  • Who's the architect, and what comparable have they delivered?
  • Do the lobbies need lights during the day?
  • Gym/pool/lobby sized for how many residents? (gym sqft / residents)
  • Does this unit's layout meet your Vastu requirements (entry, kitchen, master)?
  • Can a fire tender or an ambulance reach the lobby?
  • Who is actually building it?
  • Mivan or conventional — and how are the tie-holes grouted and cracks controlled?
  • What's the realistic floor-cycle, and how does the monsoon factor in?
  • Which steel/cement? Facade glazing spec? MEP contractor? STP/solar?
  • Which marble/fittings exactly? Which window system? VRV brand?
  • Deck/bathroom waterproofing system? How's the facade sealed into the structure?
  • Gypsum or block internal walls — and are the party walls insulated?
  • Does the back-up generator power my whole flat, or only the common areas?
  • Is the parking solo, tandem, or a mechanical stack — and how wide are the bays?
Understand “Build Planning & Quality” on the X-Ray page ↗
Community6.0/10
A mid-luxury sale community, kept apart from the rehab

At a Rs 35-40,000 a square foot band this is a mid-luxury sale community, living alongside the rehabilitated residents on the estate but in separate towers with separate access rather than in the same building.

What to ask the builder
  • What is the ticket-size range in the building — the gap between the cheapest and the most expensive home?
  • Is the building vegetarian-only, or skewed to a single community?
  • Is it owner-occupied, or investor- and tenant-heavy?
  • What is the pet policy?
Understand “Community” on the X-Ray page ↗

Findings register

10 findings · severity-ranked

Every marketed claim set against the documented fact, sourced. Critical and high first.

MEDIUM
'Financial Encumbrance: No', a nil CERSAI search on one of sixteen parcels, and Rs 279.97 crore of project borrowing in the same dump
MarketedPortal 'Financial Encumbrance: No'; promoter certificate 'not mortgaged'
DocumentedA CA certificate certifies Rs 279,97,55,418 of loan utilised on the project as at 25/11/2024, while the portal, the promoter's own non-encumbrance certificate and a CERSAI search all say clean - but the CERSAI search named only '353part' (one of sixteen C.S. numbers), was run by a Public User for Rs 10, and is ~21 months old
A Rs 279.97 crore project loan sits beside a nil encumbrance declaration whose only test - a CERSAI search on one of sixteen parcels - is too narrow to disprove a charge; treat 'no encumbrance' as untested (C10/C53).
Source: registered documents
MEDIUM
Basement stage against a 2031 completion, with 158 units already sold and only a plinth Commencement Certificate that has lapsed
MarketedLuxury towers with a marketed possession
DocumentedNineteen months after registration both P68 wings are below plinth (Wing B basement 66%, Wing A 10%, superstructure and all Table-B works 0%) against a 30/06/2031 completion; the Commencement Certificate extends to plinth only. Phase-2 field: the estate is a live phased pipeline (NOT delivered) - Tower-1 nears possession by end-2026 and Tower-2 targets Dec-2027, both ahead of their RERA dates (2028/2029), with the rehab progressing; the developer is executing the lead towers on schedule-plus. 158 of 362 sold + 13 booked, with 'Unregistered' rows against some sold units.
P68 is the earliest-stage and last-to-complete of the estate's towers - basement now, 2031 target - while the developer is visibly delivering the lead towers (Tower-1 ~end-2026, Tower-2 ~Dec-2027) ahead of their RERA dates; so this is a real construction runway on an executing scheme, with build quality the watch, rather than a stalled or unproven project (C26/C31/C34).
Source: government filings, registered documents
LOW-MED
Portal says 'no litigation' while the title report annexes thirteen pending High Court matters and the page carries a live complaint
Marketed'Is there any litigation against this proposed project: No'
DocumentedThirteen pending Bombay High Court matters (Annexure 2), essentially all from the displacement of prior developer East & West; five are covered by a registered Notice of Lis Pendens on the record of title; court petition(L) 633/2021 seeks to quash the very MCGM termination Godrej's title rests on, and court petition(L) 5389/2021 names GPDL as a respondent; plus a live MahaRERA complaint CC12605165 (13/08/2026, Hearing Scheduled)
The portal reads 'no litigation' while the title report annexes 13 pending High Court matters - but those are substantially the displaced prior developer's challenge to its own 2020 removal, which counsel opines does not affect the current developer's rights; the point is portal legibility, not a live title threat.
Source: registered documents, government filings
LOW-MED
A legacy dispute: the developer replaced in 2020 is still contesting its removal
MarketedA Godrej Properties luxury development
DocumentedShree Azad Nagar Society granted rights to East & West Builders in 2003 (LOI 2005, tripartite 2006); MCGM terminated the LOI, tripartite and deed of confirmation and cancelled all approvals by letter 26/02/2020; recognised Godrej as new developer 01/02/2021 (DA 16/08/2021); East & West challenges the termination in court petition(L) 633/2021 and is applicant/appellant in eight of the thirteen pending matters | Corrected weighting (Phase 3): development rights are registered and operative (JDA + tri-partite, MCGM a party; 2 of 3 sale towers topped out); the litigation is the ousted prior developer's, opined non-affecting - a legacy cloud, not a live challenge to Godrej's rights.
Godrej is the replacement developer after the municipality removed East & West in 2020; the ousted party still litigates that removal (Lis Pendens on record). But MCGM recognised Godrej under a registered development + tri-partite agreement, the societies signed on, and the scheme is built out - two of three sale towers topped out - so this reads as a legacy cloud counsel opines is non-affecting, not a threat to operative rights. Confirm current status.
Source: registered documents
LOW-MED
Marketed EAST 'sea view' from the westernmost tower looks across the promoter's own taller sale towers
Marketed'EAST SIDE / SEA VIEWS' with per-unit view arrows
DocumentedTower-3 is the westernmost of three sale towers; its east aspect crosses the promoter's own Sale Tower-2 (44 floors) and Tower-1 (40 floors). Phase-2 field: above ~F20 the EAST harbour aspect is REAL (foreground is low-rise Tejas Colony, then MBPT land, then BPCL, then harbour); below ~F20 it is walled by the siblings/podium. West is the deliberate non-view side. A distant NE slum (Ramabai) is a low-probability taller-redevelopment threat.
The priced east 'sea/harbour' aspect is genuine from the upper floors (~F20+), where it clears the promoter's own Towers 1 & 2 and a low-rise eastern foreground; lower and mid floors look into the sibling towers and podium. West is intentionally the non-view side. Field-confirmed directionally; a numeric View awaits the out-of-corridor obstruction build.
Source: marketing, Rexray analysis
LOW-MED
Four-phase estate presented as a single project; the portal's phase flag is blank
MarketedPortal 'multiple phases' blank/No
DocumentedThe estate runs four phases - Sale Tower-1 (P51900034851, completion 2028, under complaint CC006000000231175), Sale Tower-2 (P51900049757, completion 2029), Sale Tower-3 (this registration, 2031) and a Phase-IV amenity+MLCP - plus a separate rehab component; the Commencement Certificate is a single estate-wide certificate whose only Tower-3 endorsement is its last
Every document must be checked to belong to Tower-3: the Commencement Certificate, the layout and the Proforma A are estate-wide, and only the last Commencement Certificate endorsement and the portal Building Details are this registration's (C24/FINDING 6).
Source: government filings, registered documents
LOW-MED
The sale agreement pre-consents the developer to keep building on the estate and to own/sell any future construction (the agreement cl.13.8)
MarketedA completed Godrej Horizon community
Documentedthe agreement cl.13.8 has the buyer pre-consent to the developer putting up further construction and consuming all/incremental floor area (FSI) (incl. fungible) on the Land even after society formation, with any additional construction the developer's sole property to sell; on a four-phase estate with a G+10 MLCP and future development potential this is a live density/amenity-load term, not boilerplate. Also standard developer-favourable terms: cl.10 payment appropriation at developer discretion, cl.16 Rs 220/sqm/mo holding charges + 15-day deemed possession.
The agreement signs the buyer up in advance to more construction on the estate and to the developer owning and selling that future built-up area - worth reading against the four-phase master plan, since it can add density and load without a further consent.
Source: registered documents
LOW
The land vests in MCGM; the portal's two 'landowner' societies do not own it, and neither does Godrej
MarketedPortal lists Om & Shree Azadnagar CHS as 'Promoter-Landowner'
DocumentedThe Property Register Cards for all sixteen C.S. numbers reflect MCGM as owner; the title opinion names MCGM as 'Owner' and GPDL + the two societies only as 'Developer/Promoter'; the societies hold DCR 33(7) tenant rights, Godrej holds development rights via the 2021 DA + 2022 tripartite (MCGM a party); Commencement Certificate condition 4 reads 'does not entitle you to develop land which does not vest in you'; the 2026 corrigendum re-affirms MCGM's ownership
The land stays with the municipality and the societies and the developer builds under a registered development + tri-partite agreement - normal tenure for a Mumbai 33(7) redevelopment, not a defect; just read tenure off the title report, not the portal's 'landowner' block.
Source: registered documents, government filings
LOW
Parking is self-park by ramp in a shared podium/basement structure (plus a G+10 sale MLCP), allotted near your tower
Marketed268 covered bays per wing (portal); podium + MLCP parking
DocumentedLayout sheet 2/6 ('7th-floor podium-level layout plan') draws the sale-tower podium (landscaped deck on top), ramps and 6-9 m driveways, plus a separate G+10 sale MLCP. Phase-2 field: 3 basements + 7 podium levels, self-park via ramp, ~1894 sale bays total (536 for P68, 244 resident + 24 visitor/wing), ratio ~1.35/unit, allotments near your own tower. The Phase-1 'bays in an undrawn separate MLCP -> mechanism unknown' reading is superseded.
Parking is covered self-park reached by ramp in the sale-tower podium and basements (plus a G+10 MLCP), with bays allotted close to your tower - a comfortable tier A/B; the only mild cost is time in a multi-level stack and a short walk to the lift lobby. Not the lift-dependent/undrawn risk the blind pass flagged.
Source: government filings
LOW
The SECTION sheet's index box reads TOWER-1 on a Tower-3 sheet run
Marketedn/a
DocumentedSheets 01/13-12/13 head 'TOWER-3 : WING-A & WING-B'; sheet 13/13 (SECTION A-A) heads 'TOWER-1 : WING-A & WING-B', and its BUA diagram is captioned to the 44th floor, while Tower-3 is sanctioned to 42/40 - so the section may be Tower-1's bound into the Tower-3 set
No Tower-3 floor-to-floor level table was sealed from the section sheet because its index box names Tower-1; the floor count was taken from the per-floor BUA table on sheet 01/13 and the portal instead (C59).
Source: government filings
Five questions to ask before you commit
  1. What is the current status of WP(L) 633/2021 and the other pending High Court matters, and does any of them reach the sale component's title?
  2. Can you get a current, independent CERSAI charge search across all sixteen C.S. numbers - is the Rs 279.97 crore project loan secured on the land or the development rights?
  3. Which floor is the unit on? The east harbour aspect only clears the sibling towers from roughly the 20th floor up.
  4. Which podium or basement level and bay are allotted, how far from your tower's lift core, and is a private EV charger allowed?
  5. What is the all-in rate - any cash component beyond the ~Rs 38,000/sqft registered price, and what fit-out is included over the bare RCC shell?
Rexray — Real Estate X-Ray. This is a research view built from registered documents, government filings, and Rexray field analysis; it is not legal, financial, or investment advice. Verify every figure against the source documents before you transact.
© 2026 Rexray.AI