The Imperial I
P35Podium complete, no apartment floors, possession promised 2029 · RERA P51900050473
An address at the top of Tardeo, sold from a tower where the only thing standing is the car park.
- The governing commencement certificate is absent, and the latest one on file expired 17/02/2026.
- The land vests in sixteen owners, and the MHADA permission is in a landowner's name and expired.
Pillar scores are provisional roll-ups derived from the 16 attribute scores · FVL numeric scoring pending across all properties
- Produce the construction certificate dated around 20 March 2026 that your portal records but does not attach. The most recent one in your own agreement's annexures reaches the 22nd floor and expired on 17 February 2026.
- What exactly is 'ECA' on your unit plates? It is defined nowhere in the brochure, and your registered agreement calls it limited common area and says no price was charged for it.
- Your brochure shows three apartment sizes. On ten of the twenty-seven floors your own inventory shows a different configuration, with about 29 square metres moved out of the largest apartment. Which applies to the floor being offered?
- Raheja Sobo Residences was registered with the regulator four days after this agreement, stands 225 metres north-west at a reported 238 metres, and will sit 61 metres above your terrace. What is your disclosure to buyers on the view?
- Has the housing-board permission been revalidated in the developer's name? Your own title opinion is expressly conditional on it, and the certificate in the file is in the landowner's name and recorded as expired.
The asset is not the problem. Access, lifts, kitchen ventilation, the deep podium and the price position all score well, and the rehabilitation component is properly separated into its own building with its own society. What drags this down is everything to do with delivery and the public record: no superstructure certified across 27 months, a governing construction certificate absent from the file with the latest one expired, apartments registered up to the 41st floor against a certified 22nd, and a portal that answers 'no litigation' where the developer's own title report discloses five matters. Both of the heaviest flags are answerable with documents the developer already holds — which is why this reads as a property to investigate rather than one to walk away from.
Source tags — REG registered docs · GOV government · REXRAY field intel · SEC verified secondary · MKT marketing (documents claims, never verifies).