Ajmera Downtown
P79A 33(7) cessed redevelopment in Bhuleshwar - one tower, sale homes above rehoused tenants. · RERA P51900031924
Approved and owned freehold - but nearly-topped-yet-unfinished, rehab-gated and sold on a view it can't fully prove.
Pillar scores are provisional roll-ups derived from the 16 attribute scores · FVL numeric scoring pending across all properties
- Is the rehabilitation of the 121 existing tenants complete, and does the sale tower's occupation certificate depend on it?
- With about half the cost still to spend and roughly a sixth of the flats sold in four years, how is the remaining construction funded - and is there any Ajmera group backing behind the single-project company?
- What is the status of the 2019 City Civil suit that the sale agreement warrants does not exist?
- Can I see the current sanctioned plan set (the 2022 generation) - the layout, a section and the floor and parking plates - and confirm the tower as built matches it?
- For the mechanised parking: how many car lifts per tower, the peak retrieval time, any SUV limit, any visitor provision, and can I fit an EV charger to my bay?
The land is owned freehold and the tower is genuinely approved to its full height, so this is not a sanction risk. It is dragged by execution and disclosure: about half the cost is unspent with fit-out barely started against a date never revised; a registered warranty contradicts its own title report on a pending tenant suit; 121 tenants are rehoused inside the tower; and parking is entirely mechanised. Geometry and view cannot be sealed because the current sanctioned drawings are absent.
Source tags — REG registered docs · GOV government · REXRAY field intel · SEC verified secondary · MKT marketing (documents claims, never verifies).