Sea views marketed; the protected outlook is the Mahalaxmi racecourse. · RERA PR1170002502274
MahaRERA PR1170002502274 · K Raheja Corp Real Estate Pvt Ltd · SRA 33(11) free-sale · 49 floors / 219.5 m
Overall Score6.8/10as of 09/26
A blue-chip South-Bombay address on a clean freehold, sold on a sea view the west skyline can still take away - where the durable view is the racecourse, possession depends on an off-site transit camp, and the ask sits above Imperial.
Flags none
No single deal-breaker (no flags). The fundamentals are strong - a clean freehold, a top-firm marketable title, a 'super' whole-floor layout, ~3-minute arterial access and low density, from a Grade-A developer. What holds it to Fair, and to an investigate stance, is a cluster of open, buyer-material unknowns: possession depends on an off-site SRA transit camp (PTC) and the tower is barely started (2033), the marketed sea view is not lifetime-protected, and the ask is expected above the Imperial band (front-row position + brand) on a view that does not fully support it. Resolve the PTC-dependency status, the whole-floor carpet/price and the western-plot risk before committing.
The five things that decide it
1The apartment - whole-floor 'super layout' with a private lift-lobby bonus, racecourse-facing decks, and Grade-B lifts.
2Possession carries an SRA dependency: the occupation certificate is gated on the off-site PTC (permanent transit camp) rehousing being completed elsewhere (Scheme-II/III), on a tower still early (~0.4% built, completion 2033). K Raheja's Grade-A delivery record is the offset.
3The marketed sea view is not lifetime-protected - two speculative western builds (a disputed Vellard plot; a 'BayView' plot opposite, no RERA yet) can take it. The durable view is the Mahalaxmi racecourse.
4Freehold title, clear & marketable on a top firm's opinion (rare for an SRA scheme), on a ~3-minute arterial in genuinely central SoBo.
5Expect an ask above the Imperial band - a front-row-of-Imperial position and the K Raheja name command the premium - on a view that is not protected for life; a ground-floor restaurant and a ₹450 Cr land charge sit alongside.
Fundamentals
6.4/10FairPillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.
Clear Title8.0/10
Freehold and clear & marketable - with a few historical tail-items to close
- The developer owns the land freehold, and Wadia Ghandy & Co opine the title is clear and marketable - unusually clean for a scheme run through the Slum Rehabilitation Authority.
- This is the former Crossroads Mall site, assembled by buying out the old condominium owners.
- A ₹450 Cr ICICI mortgage sits on the land (the developer says the loan funds other projects, not this one) - your flat will need to be released from that charge at sale.
- The ground-floor restaurant owner (Hardcastle) keeps a small unpaid vendor's charge on 2.80% of the land until a side option is settled.
- Older record items to close: a 1983 urban-land-ceiling order over 127 sq m, a 2009 lis-pendens notice whose suit was dismissed in 2014, and a survey card not yet updated for a road setback.
A 1994 lease to the electricity utility for a 49 sq m substation sits on a corner of the plot - normal, and disclosed.
What to ask the builder- How and when is each flat released from the ₹450 Cr land charge, and has the 2009 lis-pendens notice been cancelled?
Understand “Clear Title” on the X-Ray page ↗Delivery5.5/10
Strong builder, but possession is tied to an off-site rehab and the tower is barely started
- K Raheja Corp is an established, well-capitalised developer, which is the main reason to be comfortable here.
- But this is the free-sale half of an SRA scheme: the rules say no occupation certificate for the sale building until the equivalent rehabilitation is finished, and the rehab obligation has been shifted to other schemes (Scheme-II and III) off this plot.
- The tower is also only about 0.4% built - plinth-only approval to build, with the whole structure, finishes and services still ahead and a stated completion of 2033.
- The floors themselves are fully sanctioned, so this is a timing-and-linkage risk, not an approval risk.
What to ask the builder- What is the status and the outer date of the linked rehab (Scheme-II/III) that gates the occupation certificate?
Understand “Delivery” on the X-Ray page ↗Developer Compliance6.0/10
Complete and current RERA filing, but the uploaded layouts are hard to read
- The MahaRERA record is freshly registered (2026) and complete.
- The mark-down is legibility - the sanctioned plans on the portal are unclear (they had to be rendered at high resolution to read), which is a transparency cost for a buyer doing their own diligence.
Understand “Developer Compliance” on the X-Ray page ↗Brochure-vs-Reality6.0/10
The gap to watch is the pitch vs the view and the price
- Expect the marketing to lead on SoBo sea/bay views and Imperial-band pricing.
- The record supports neither cleanly: the durable open view is the racecourse (the sea is not protected), and fair value on an unprotected view sits under ₹1 lakh/psf.
- There is no floor-count inflation - 49 floors are sanctioned.
Understand “Brochure-vs-Reality” on the X-Ray page ↗
Livability
7.5/10StrongPillar score is the average of the scored attributes below; some attributes are qualitative and carry questions rather than a number.
Compound Density7.5/10
Low-density whole-floor living, with a restaurant at the base
- Density inside the plot is low - roughly one family per floor and no slum-rehab tower on the plot (that obligation was moved off-site).
- The one cohabitation item is a ground-and-first-floor restaurant (the rehoused Hardcastle unit); check that its access and servicing are kept separate from the residential lobby and driveway.
Understand “Compound Density” on the X-Ray page ↗Neighbourhood5.0/10
Central and posh, but a busy junction and a rehab reservation next door
- Positives: an established South-Mumbai address, a green-belt reservation and the racecourse keeping the north-west open, and proximity to the signal that spares it some through-traffic.
- Negatives: a Rehabilitation & Resettlement reservation on the south boundary (a possible future rehab mass), redevelopment activity on the road (the Imperial cluster), and the Haji Ali junction clogging with visitor traffic on weekends.
Understand “Neighbourhood” on the X-Ray page ↗Peak-Hour Connectivity9.0/10
Excellent - about 3 minutes to a fast artery
Roughly a 3-minute run to the nearest arterial / coastal-road entry - among the best access in the Rexray set for a central location.
Fixable? Builders like to sell connectivity as kilometres from a landmark — but the real test is time, not distance: how long you would actually be stuck, at peak hour, just getting to a fast arterial like a Sea Link or Coastal Road on-ramp. The access route and the on-ramp are municipal and outside the developer's control, so there is no fix to offer — only an honest read of the peak-hour reality today and the area's trajectory by 2032, once the surrounding pipeline has built out.
Understand “Peak-Hour Connectivity” on the X-Ray page ↗Kitchen Ventilation9.0/10
Pass - kitchens vent to an external service yard
Both kitchens open onto an enclosed utility / service yard on the building's outer face, so there is a real path for cooking air to the outside rather than recirculation.
Understand “Kitchen Ventilation” on the X-Ray page ↗Lift Wait7.5/10
Grade B lifts - comfortable for a 219 m tower
With about six lifts (including fire) at ~5 m/s and only one family per floor, the lift wait works out to roughly 34 seconds - a solid Grade B; the only limit is the sheer travel height of a 219 m tower.
About a 34-second interval at peak on the confirmed lift spec; the low one-family-per-floor demand keeps queues short.
Understand “Lift Wait” on the X-Ray page ↗Water Adequacy7.0/10
No water-loading red flag; the adequacy certificate is still to come
- There is no water-supply risk from squeezing extra flats onto the plot - the sanctioned area is fixed.
- The formal municipal water-adequacy certificate (Section 270A) is required before the building-completion stage and isn't in the file yet; confirm it as construction progresses.
Understand “Water Adequacy” on the X-Ray page ↗Parking7.0/10
Self-park on a ramped podium, with enough bays
- You drive to your own bay up a ramped podium (with some tandem and mechanical-stack bays in the mix), and the bay count comfortably exceeds the requirement.
- Marks come off for the nine-deck climb and for the parking being a licensed permission rather than a deeded bay - confirm the terms in the agreement.
Understand “Parking” on the X-Ray page ↗Build Planning & Qualitynot yet scored
A checklist to verify with the builder — Rexray will score this attribute as the field database grows.
Rexray's database will, over time, be enriched with the attention to detail and quality ethos of each builder. For now, below is the checklist you should verify with the builder before you decide.
What to ask the builder- Who's the architect, and what comparable have they delivered?
- Do the lobbies need lights during the day?
- Gym/pool/lobby sized for how many residents? (gym sqft / residents)
- Does this unit's layout meet your Vastu requirements (entry, kitchen, master)?
- Can a fire tender or an ambulance reach the lobby?
- Who is actually building it?
- Mivan or conventional — and how are the tie-holes grouted and cracks controlled?
- What's the realistic floor-cycle, and how does the monsoon factor in?
- Which steel/cement? Facade glazing spec? MEP contractor? STP/solar?
- Which marble/fittings exactly? Which window system? VRV brand?
- Deck/bathroom waterproofing system? How's the facade sealed into the structure?
- Gypsum or block internal walls — and are the party walls insulated?
- Does the back-up generator power my whole flat, or only the common areas?
- Is the parking solo, tandem, or a mechanical stack — and how wide are the bays?
Understand “Build Planning & Quality” on the X-Ray page ↗Community8.0/10
A clean, small, high-end resident community
Whole-floor apartments mean a small number of high-net-worth households, and the transaction is all-accounted with no cash component - a clean buyer profile.
What to ask the builder- What is the ticket-size range in the building — the gap between the cheapest and the most expensive home?
- Is the building vegetarian-only, or skewed to a single community?
- Is it owner-occupied, or investor- and tenant-heavy?
- What is the pet policy?
Understand “Community” on the X-Ray page ↗
Findings register
10 findings · severity-ranked
Every marketed claim set against the documented fact, sourced. Critical and high first.
MED-HIGH
SRA free-sale delivery linkage - the sale building's OC is gated on the rehab/PTC completion, and Commencement Certificate is released phase-wise against rehab progress
Marketed-
DocumentedIOA Note 2: no occupation permission for the sale building until the OC for the equivalent Rehabilitation/PTC area is granted; Note 1: Commencement Certificate for the sale building is released phase-wise by CEO(SRA) in proportion to actual rehab progress; condition 14: Commencement Certificate per co-relation of PTC transferred to Scheme-II & III (off-plot).
This is an SRA free-sale tower: possession depends on the developer finishing the rehab/transit obligation in linked schemes, not just on building this tower.
Source: government filings
MEDIUM
Former Crossroads Mall site carries a Rs.450 Cr ICICI mortgage declared 'not utilised for this project'
Marketed-
DocumentedThe land carries an ICICI Rs.450 Cr mortgage (22/05/2024 + additional security 06/11/2025; outstanding Rs.409.74 Cr @30/09/2025), fully drawn but declared NOT utilised for this project. Title is otherwise clear & marketable.
A Rs.450 Cr corporate charge sits on the project land even though the loan funds other uses - buyers need a per-unit charge-release at sale.
Source: registered documents, government filings
MEDIUM
A rehoused restaurant tenant (Hardcastle) occupies the ground + first floor, with an unpaid vendor's charge on 2.80% of the land
Marketed-
DocumentedThe Gr+1st floor is a rehoused commercial restaurant unit (Hardcastle Restaurants) allotted via a PAAA/Deed of Apartment and shown as one composite unit on RERA; Hardcastle holds an option on the first-floor unit (Rs.19.50 Cr) and an unpaid vendor's charge on 2.80% undivided interest until it is resolved.
There is a restaurant at the base of the residential tower, and a small vendor's charge on the land until the developer settles the restaurant tenant's option.
Source: registered documents, government filings
MEDIUM
No registered first-sale agreement - only the model/proforma the agreement and its deviation report are on record
Marketed-
DocumentedThe folder holds the MahaRERA MODEL/proforma the agreement + Deviation Report, not a registered first-sale agreement. The deviations follow the usual model-the agreement pattern (possession 'as estimated and decided by the Promoter at its sole discretion', promoter termination on default, carpet-area variation, force-majeure factors).
The real commercial terms (price, sold-unit carpet, payment schedule, possession/force-majeure wording) are not yet fixed by a registered agreement.
Source: registered documents
MEDIUM
The durable view is the Mahalaxmi racecourse (north-west), not a lifetime sea view - two speculative future builds sit in the western sea arc
MarketedSoBo sea-facing / bay views (expected marketing)
DocumentedThe living-room decks are oriented N/north-west to the Mahalaxmi racecourse - the defensible, durable open view. The pure-west/WSW Haji Ali sea arc is NOT lifetime-protected: the Vellard Society disputed land (HBS was the initial builder) and a plot opposite SoBo signposted 'BayView' (no RERA filing yet) are both expected to build eventually into that arc.
Buy this for the racecourse view to the north-west, not for a guaranteed sea view - the west can be built out.
Source: Rexray analysis
MEDIUM
Expect a premium to the Imperial band (front-row position + K Raheja brand) on a view that is not protected for life
MarketedPremium to the Imperial band (front-row of Imperial Towers; K Raheja brand)
DocumentedThe ask is expected ABOVE the Imperial band - the tower stands front-row of the Imperial towers (position premium) and carries the K Raheja Grade-A brand. On view protection alone fair value sits under Rs.1 lakh/psf carpet (no lifetime sea; durable view = racecourse north-west). No cash component.
Expect a premium to Imperial - part-justified by position and brand, part paying for a sea view that can be built out.
Source: Rexray analysis
LOW-MED
Sold as single full-floor apartments - lift lobby is an uncharged bonus (verify in the agreement); tenement statement (128) vs RERA units (61) is a density-metric vs whole-floor artefact
Marketed-
DocumentedProforma-A shows 128 notional tenements (~4 cells/floor of 149.90 sq m carpet); RERA records 61 residential units; Rexray field confirms marketing sells SINGLE FULL-FLOOR apartments. A single-flat-per-floor layout means the lift lobby is an UNCHARGED BONUS (a positive, and safer from BMC enforcement than a multi-flat exclusive lobby) UNLESS the registered the agreement sells the lobby as RERA area.
You buy the whole floor - the lift lobby comes as a private bonus, which is a plus, as long as the agreement doesn't charge it as carpet.
Source: government filings, registered documents
LOW-MED
Very early stage - 0.41% complete, Commencement Certificate to plinth only, completion 2033
Marketed-
DocumentedWork done 0.41% of estimated cost; the entire superstructure, finishes and MEP are ahead; completion target 30/11/2033.
This is an early launch with a long ~7-year horizon - the payment exposure runs against a project barely out of the ground.
Source: registered documents, government filings
LOW-MED
Residual title tail-items: 1983 ULC order (127 sq m), a 2009 lis-pendens notice (suit dismissed 2014), and an un-updated PR card
Marketed-
Documented1983 ULC order declared 127 sq m of that land parcel/738 excess vacant (final status not established); a 2009 lis-pendens notice (Suit 1241/2009) sits on the SRO record though the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution in 2014; the that land parcel/738 PR card still shows 2,999.09 (not the 2,249.37 post-setback possession).
A few historical record tail-items remain to be closed out, none of which the title firm treated as impairing marketability.
Source: registered documents
LOW
Open west aspect (green belt + Consulate + open land) but an R&R reservation on the south boundary
Marketed-
DocumentedThe west boundary abuts an E.O.S. (green-belt) reservation + open land + the Japan Consulate; the south boundary abuts a Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R&R 2.1) reservation - a potential future rehab/PAP mass. Rexray field confirms the durable open aspect is the Mahalaxmi RACECOURSE to the W/north-west.
The N/W racecourse aspect is the durable open view; the south carries a future rehab-reservation to watch.
Source: government filings