Real Estate X-Ray

Kabra Dvayam

P23

Worli Sea Face, second row — 29 of 54 flats are rehousing units · RERA P51900078546 (DVAYAM, single building)

Kabra Dvayam plot outlined on the Rexray View MapYour plot on the 2032 skyline · tap for context
Overall Score5.4/10as of 08/26

A second-row Worli Sea Face tower at less than half the frontline rate, with a sea view that is real today and borrowed from the building in front — sold bare shell, and gated on a slum-rehabilitation scheme eight kilometres away.

Flags
  1. No sale-building occupation permission until equivalent rehabilitation area gets its OC; the transit-camp duty moved to a Sewree scheme, undelivered.
  2. Marketing counts all fifty-four flats as luxury residences; the sanctioned drawings show twenty-nine are rehousing units in the same tower.
The 5 things that decide it tap to jump
FVL — Rexray's index · F Fundamentals · V Value · L Livability · each pillar is the average of its scored attributes, scored 0–10: Weak (<4) · Mixed (4–6) · Fair (6–7.5) · Strong (7.5+) · the verdict is set separately, by hard-stop rules · Scoring Methodology →
The plot & what surrounds it — at 2032
Rexray View Map: Kabra Dvayam and its surrounding development modelled at 2032
Kabra Dvayam — plot boundaryResidentialCommercialFuture confirmed development (layout speculative)Existing Building
Rexray View Map — every surrounding mass is modelled from sanctioned or filed data at possession-horizon build-out. The red boundary marks the Kabra Dvayam plot; the coloured blocks around it are the neighbouring residential, commercial, and rehabilitation development at build-out. This is the density the Livability score is measuring.

Pillar scores are provisional roll-ups derived from the 16 attribute scores · FVL numeric scoring pending across all properties

Five questions to ask before you commit
  1. Show me the current commencement certificate, the floor it runs to today, and the authority's phasing letter — and tell me the on-ground status of the Sewree scheme my occupation certificate depends on.
  2. How tall is the building directly to my west, is its society in redevelopment discussions, and what happens to my west outlook if it rebuilds to the height of The Legacy two hundred metres away?
  3. Which floors will the rehousing families occupy, do I share a landing or a lift lobby with one, and have the eight original member entitlements missing from the sanctioned count been bought out — with more in discussion?
  4. Show me the existing lease, its expiry, and the Corporation's renewal terms — and explain the High Court proceedings your own clause 17(l) discloses while the title certificate and the regulator's record say there is no litigation.
  5. Is there a cash component on top of the registered price, what is the fit-out cost per square foot on a bare shell, and can I contract a third full-size parking bay in writing given the project carries thirty-seven bays above what the rules require?
Analyst's Read

Fundamentals carry the weight and they are thin: authority to build stops at the plinth, occupation is gated off-site, tenure is a roughly thirty-year municipal lease with no conveyance, and the marketing counts rehousing flats as luxury residences. Against that sits a genuine value case — less than half the Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan Road frontline rate for a locality the registered documents support — plus outstanding access, honest parking, a clean restricted-common-area position and a sea aspect that is real today. Not a defect story and not an overpricing story. A contingency story, priced accordingly.

Want a Rexray on a different project?
Tell us which Worli–Lower Parel tower to analyse next, and we’ll email you the report the moment it’s live.

One email when your report’s ready. No spam, ever.

Got it.

Rexray — Real Estate X-Ray · rendered from the registered-document analysis the chat and X-Ray page read.
Source tagsREG registered docs · GOV government · REXRAY field intel · SEC verified secondary · MKT marketing (documents claims, never verifies).
© 2026 Rexray.AI