Real Estate X-Ray
Ask Rexray Compare Tool Full Detailed Report Get Updates

Sattva Sumera - Wing A

P59

Bhoiwada SRA sale tower on municipal land; its plot is sub-judice as a recreation ground · RERA PM1170002502568 (Wing A)

Sattva Sumera plot outlined on the Rexray View MapYour plot on the 2032 skyline · tap for context
Overall Score5.4/10as of 09/26

The brochure sells a Sewri landmark; the record shows land the developer doesn't own and a plot in court

Flags
  1. In court on its own survey numbers: neighbours want a 35% recreation ground where the layout provides 8%, and all other construction stopped.
  2. The ground is the municipality's and the Bombay Improvement Trust's, not the developer's, which holds a development right the portal calls ownership.
The 5 things that decide it tap to jump
FVL — Rexray's index · F Fundamentals · V Value · L Livability · each pillar is the average of its scored attributes, scored 0–10: Weak (<4) · Mixed (4–6) · Fair (6–7.5) · Strong (7.5+) · the verdict is set separately, by hard-stop rules · Scoring Methodology →
The plot & what surrounds it — at 2032
Rexray View Map: Sattva Sumera and its surrounding development modelled at 2032
Sattva Sumera — plot boundaryResidentialCommercialFuture confirmed development (layout speculative)Existing Building
Rexray View Map — every surrounding mass is modelled from sanctioned or filed data at possession-horizon build-out. The red boundary marks the Sattva Sumera plot; the coloured blocks around it are the neighbouring residential, commercial, and rehabilitation development at build-out. This is the density the Livability score is measuring.

Pillar scores are provisional roll-ups derived from the 16 attribute scores · FVL numeric scoring pending across all properties

Five questions to ask before you commit
  1. What is the current status of the two High Court matters asking that this plot be a recreation ground, and is there any order affecting construction on C.S. 437 and 440?
  2. The land is the municipality's and the BIT's, not yours - on what lease or conveyance, on what term, and when does the ground pass to the residents' society, and who bears any premium?
  3. The permission reaches only plinth - what is the superstructure Commencement Certificate position, and since the rehabilitation is off-site, is this sale wing's occupation tied to delivering and getting OC on those off-site tenements?
  4. About a third of a Rs.5 crore bare-shell price falls due before the eighth slab is cast - will you tie the payments harder to construction milestones?
  5. Which RERA number is Wing B, will it still be under construction after Wing A's occupation, and is the clubhouse, the pools and the podium parking shared with it and the future commercial tower - with the allocation, in writing?
Analyst's Read

INVESTIGATE. Field review credits a capable, Mumbai-debuting builder (delivery lifted) and a genuinely candid presentation (r2r lifted), and the livability engineering and the Worli-Sewri connector keep V and L healthy. But F still carries the leaf at 0.60 and F stays weak on the two facts that decide whether the tower exists at all: the developer does not own the land and the right to build the plot is in court. Not a SKIP - the builder is real, the disclosure is honest and several risks are resolvable; capped at Mixed because title and delivery are the exposure until the litigation, the conveyance and the build move on the ground.

Want a Rexray on a different project?
Tell us which Worli–Lower Parel tower to analyse next, and we’ll email you the report the moment it’s live.

One email when your report’s ready. No spam, ever.

✓

Got it.

Rexray — Real Estate X-Ray · rendered from the registered-document analysis the chat and X-Ray page read.
Source tags — REG registered docs · GOV government · REXRAY field intel · SEC verified secondary · MKT marketing (documents claims, never verifies).
© 2026 Rexray.AI