Real Estate X-Ray
Ask Rexray Compare Tool Full Detailed Report Get Updates

The V Mansion

P73

An 80%-rehab society redevelopment; the sale flats take only self-funded buyers. · RERA PR1170002502351 (The V Mansion, Wing A + Wing B)

The V Mansion plot outlined on the Rexray View MapYour plot on the 2032 skyline · tap for context
Overall Score5.8/10as of 09/26

A luxury Prabhadevi address that rehouses seventy cessed-building families in the wing it sells eighteen flats in.

Flags
  1. A Rs 50 crore lender charge releases per unit only for a self-funded buyer: the current NOC bars a home loan on the flat.
The 5 things that decide it tap to jump
FVL — Rexray's index · F Fundamentals · V Value · L Livability · each pillar is the average of its scored attributes, scored 0–10: Weak (<4) · Mixed (4–6) · Fair (6–7.5) · Strong (7.5+) · the verdict is set separately, by hard-stop rules · Scoring Methodology →
The plot & what surrounds it — at 2032
Rexray View Map: The V Mansion and its surrounding development modelled at 2032
The V Mansion — plot boundaryResidentialCommercialFuture confirmed development (layout speculative)Existing Building
Rexray View Map — every surrounding mass is modelled from sanctioned or filed data at possession-horizon build-out. The red boundary marks the The V Mansion plot; the coloured blocks around it are the neighbouring residential, commercial, and rehabilitation development at build-out. This is the density the Livability score is measuring.

Pillar scores are provisional roll-ups derived from the 16 attribute scores · FVL numeric scoring pending across all properties

Five questions to ask before you commit
  1. Can you buy this apartment with a home loan, or does the lender's release note require you to self-fund? Get the per-unit release terms and the escrow condition in writing before you commit.
  2. The development agreement rehouses seventy-five existing tenements - the forty-three members map cleanly to Wing A, so ask specifically about the chawl tenants in Wing B: are all twenty-eight rehoused, and are the three disputed occupants settled?
  3. At which floor does a real sea aspect actually start, and which faces look into the gap between the two neighbouring towers rather than into them?
  4. Do the sale flats and the members share the same entrance, lobby and lift core in Wing A, and is Wing B (the chawl tenants) a genuinely separate building on the podium? Ask to see it on the plan.
  5. What has this promoter actually delivered under any entity - with occupation-certificate dates and society handovers - given the brochure's claim of a completed track record?
Analyst's Read

A freehold, in-corridor Prabhadevi redevelopment with genuinely strong product objectives - a Grade-A lift core, a well-supplied ramped podium, a clean kitchen path and a declared, corroborated price - set against mixed fundamentals: an eighty-per-cent-rehab building the marketing conceals, a first-registration promoter, a lender charge that gates the sale to self-funded buyers, and a sea view that is obstructed rather than blanket.

Want a Rexray on a different project?
Tell us which Worli–Lower Parel tower to analyse next, and we’ll email you the report the moment it’s live.

One email when your report’s ready. No spam, ever.

✓

Got it.

Rexray — Real Estate X-Ray · rendered from the registered-document analysis the chat and X-Ray page read.
Source tags — REG registered docs · GOV government · REXRAY field intel · SEC verified secondary · MKT marketing (documents claims, never verifies).
© 2026 Rexray.AI